Parent Category: News
Published: 05 September 2012
Created: Wednesday, 21 August 2013
Statement by Ambassador H. E. Dr. Palitha Kohona
Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations
At the UN General Assembly Informal Interactive Dialogue on
The Report of the Secretary-General on the Responsibility to Protect:
Timely and Decisive Response
Wednesday, 5th September 2012
Let me join the previous delegations in thanking you for convening this informal interactive dialogue on the report of the Secretary-General on “The Responsibility to Protect”. We thank the Secretary-General for his report, “Timely and Decisive Response”. The presentations by the Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide, Mr. Adama Dieng, and the other distinguished panelists have been very helpful.
Mr. President,Adopted in the Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit, “R2P” is still to be clearly defined. The R2P concept has raised considerable sensitivities because the circumstances when it could be employed are still to be determined to the satisfaction of most of the international community.
First, the application of R2P has implications to the principle of sovereignty, long a fundamental element of international relations.
In an international political framework that is characterized by power asymmetrics, “sovereignty” places all states on an equal footing. The United Nations Charter clearly acknowledges this. Article 2 Paragraph 7 of the United Nations Charter prohibits the UN from intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of states without prejudice to the application of chapter 7. We note that the Secretary –General’s report states that the scope of application of R2P should be “narrow”, and I emphasize this, confining it only to the four specific situations mentioned in paragraph 139 of the Outcome Document , genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Conscious of the implications of infringing on the concept of sovereignty, even the drafters of the Outcome Document clearly wished to limit the application of R2P to these confines.
The Secretary-General’s report takes a pragmatic approach and states, that the goal of R2P should be to respond early and effectively, in non-coercive ways, and thereby reduce the need to rely on force. The report wisely avoids identifying force as a solution of first resort. Frequent and indiscriminate use of R2P risks eroding its credibility, or worse, threaten international peace and security. We believe that the concept of R2P should not become a political weapon, or applied selectively to fulfill geo strategic interests. The unilateral determination of the existence of situations justifying the application of R2P must be avoided. We must develop satisfactory multilateral mechanisms for this purpose.
Sri Lanka agrees with the assessment in the report that effective and early action under the first and second pillars may make action under the third pillar unnecessary. The international community should assist states to protect their populations, including from terrorism, by building national competences and capacities. There are many instances where a state may not be able to do so, mainly due to the lack of resources. Having said this, assistance provided should be sensitive to the cultural and governance systems in the recipient states. It should not be prescriptive and instead be guided by the priorities of the recipient state. Too often we have witnessed prescriptions being offered through megaphones.
The consideration process of when to apply R2P should not be influenced by emotional headlines of agenda driven media or lobby groups that distort reality. Furthermore those formulating mandates and implementing them should be held accountable for their outcomes. The application of R2P in certain situations in the recent past has given rise to concern that those relying on R2P approaches are guilty of double standards.
As mentioned earlier, the concept of R2P is still being developed. Sri Lanka hopes that those discussions will contribute to achieving consensus on all aspects of the concept of R2P.
Thank you, Mr. President.